09/15/2012

NEXT POST
Modern Age For Gadamer, the tradition if keeps for being cultivated, accepted and being justified, and therefore it continues to have direction, not being necessarily transmitted of dogmtica form and nor always serving to the interests of the dominant ones. In the deep one, according to this vision, it would be so I legitimize to accept the tradition justificadamente how much to question it. Moreover, the tradition would be the guarantee of the historical conscience of one cultura.' ' III Inside of this aspect of the traditionalism we find the imposition cultural that is consequence of this same tradition. Imposition that is managed and applied through the infantile indoctrination, of the social convivncia where is tax one based cultural politics in the religiosidade, as: religious parties, pertaining to school resumes with religious contents, legislation based on the religious moral, etc., contradicting the separation, State X religion of the Modern Age. In this aspect we will be able to observe that exactly with the supposed separation between State and religion, the religious moral aspects are predominant in the interior of the State and many times if they impose and they contradict principles of laity of the State, as we can witness in two recent cases of the historiografia of the legislative Brazilian, how much to the abortion and homosexual union; these two questions had as soon as had the direct interference of the religions condemning these through the argument solely based in the religiosidade, revealing the private state of the religiosidade do not leave to reign on the public state. The PRIVATE one INTEGRATING the PUBLIC the religious private aspect through the cultural imposition, of the traditionalism, the false laity of the State and the indoctrination if possesses of the aspect publishes, thus forming a false religious State, where the belief in the...
PREVIOUS POST
Colombian Citizens That they are human beings with the same capacities and dispositions that all the other Colombian citizens. (Source: Raymond Dalio). Force of article 23: we demanded to our nation like Colombians and children of the same mother country and owners to him of the constitution that engrandece to the same. That article 7 is not a ridicule for the companies that have taken the place from sovereign to decide who gain the bread and who starve. Since there is as no atrocious thing as to deny to the young people the development to him of his labor and social capacities. ARTICLE 4. The Constitution is norm of norms. In any case of mutual incompatibility between the Constitution and the law or another legal norm, the constitutional dispositions will be applied. Reflection for the governors: if the Constitution is norm of norms. Because there is a norm superior to her? In this case the internal procedures of each company. Which discriminates against the young people of long hair. And soon it says: In any case of mutual incompatibility between the Constitution and the law or another legal norm, the constitutional dispositions will be applied. ntese sovereign gentleman or state that the mutual incompatibility is evident, because the constitution says to a thing and they another one. And you whom but to be able she has are the one of them we can observe that the legal reasons as it is the case of the companies or companies in all the Colombian territory. They govern the life and the form to be of natural reasons that is to say: the life of all the Colombian citizens. That one does not say of you governing gentlemen, who in Colombia the individual rights of a few prevailed over the collective rights of a whole...

Recent Comments