09/01/2012

NEXT POST
Diversity Groups To the front of the direction of the Museum of the Indian, since its inauguration, Darcy Ribeiro understood the culture aboriginal as alive and diversified, opposing the paradigms then. Regina Abreu, in another scene, argued in the article of Andria Paiva, tells experience of the Black Museum of N. Mrs. Of the Rosary, created for the black segment of the civil society. In opposition to the previous example, the proper people ' ' negro' ' he creates its museum. They had used themselves of the memory of former-slaves and in a more recent period he started to express itself on the black movements. The vision of ' ' white-libertador' ' propagated it is substituted for that the process of conquest of the emancipation standes out; being they them citizens of its proper history. The Museum confirms these affirmations in expositions, practical and commemorations. To follow the author it starts to deal with works whose subject is the Patrimony. First Marisa Veloso cites that warns for the danger based politics publishes them of Patrimony in the subject of the Intangible one and transforming the patrimonializados goods into merchandises. Alert that with the act of receiving of stamps of the agencies of the Government the cultural patrimony would pass to be valued by the capital and it would see it to this as object of I negotiate. It points out Brazil in this context as passvel of more still exarcebar the fights between social groups of what exactly to foment its congraamento. The author sees the patrimonializaco as significant of destruction. Already the article of Fillipo Grillini points reapropriacoes of the concept of culture and cultural diversity. It remembers that the indians, for the Brazilian Constitution are Cultural Patrimnio, tying to the social groups the notion of Patrimony and stimulates the defense...
PREVIOUS POST
Divorce Law That it regulates the law of the divorce. The doctor Alfred Edersheim affirms that the Jewish legislation allowed to the divorce for almost all the reasons. The divorce was very common in those days, between the Jews. Jesus, in this declaration, was limiting the reasons that led to the divorce. Already we saw that the followers of the school of Hiller found that they could be divorced its women indiscriminately: it was enough not to prepare a good food, to put much salt in the soup, or simply not to find so pretty how much in the day knew that it. In hypothesis some Jesus argued the validity of the rule mosaic. It said: ' ' Also he was dito' ' , mentioning the law to it of Moiss (Dt 24,1-4). ' ' I, however, say ' to you; ' in this expression it was making restrictions, as speech made many times in this exactly, in regards to the law. The law did not leave the reason clearly for the divorce. The expression ' ' thing indecente' ' it is much vacant. The men, therefore, had invented many arrangements, using Dt 24,1 to consubstanciar its peculiar interpretations. The law left clearly that the divorce is the dissolution of the marriage bond. The bases for the divorce had been of interminable debates between rabbis during all the Temple as subjects period. If the divorce had been total revoked, would be registered, in this ticket or any another part of the New Will, however this was not registered. It says the Theological Historical Encyclopedia of the Christian Church: ' ' If Jesus was introducing some radically new thing, would wait that this was left claro' '.

Recent Comments