08/18/2012

NEXT POST
First Brazilian Constitution On the other hand, the ideas written in the project of the members of the house of representatives nothing had pleased the emperor, therefore it limited its power. In reply the Assembly, it wrote a letter, known as Great Letter, that says the following one in one of its paragraphs:? While the attributions will not be determined must compete that me as Emperor Constitucional and Perpetual Defensor of this Empire, I do not sign nor I make to execute decree some of the Assembly, that was convoked with the primary end to make the Constitution, and, according to which, is that if it must proceed to the prescribed laws, after it being for accepted me. The opposite to the project, D. Peter appealed to the military forces that, under its command, the Constituent in November of 1823 closed. Many members of the house of representatives imprisoned and had been exiled, also the Andrada brothers. The closing of the Constitutional conventional provoked the reaction of the representatives of the Brazilian Party, group formed for great land proprietors and traders of the center-south, that had supported the independence process. To calm the spirits, emperor D.Pedro I nominated an Advice of State, formed for 10 members of born Brazilians, to help it to write it the Constitution in the stated period of 40 days. Concluded the work, in day 25 of March of 1824, D. Peter granted to the First Brazilian Constitution, that is, it imposed the new Constitution that among others things, it determined: a hereditary monarchy, officialization of the religion catholic, creation of a new to be able, the room to be able called Moderator, that gave to emperor Constitutional Absolutismo, substituting the project of Constitutional Monarchy. In such way, the unitarianism was established in the country with the Constitution, government...
PREVIOUS POST
Diversity Groups To the front of the direction of the Museum of the Indian, since its inauguration, Darcy Ribeiro understood the culture aboriginal as alive and diversified, opposing the paradigms then. Regina Abreu, in another scene, argued in the article of Andria Paiva, tells experience of the Black Museum of N. Mrs. Of the Rosary, created for the black segment of the civil society. In opposition to the previous example, the proper people ' ' negro' ' he creates its museum. They had used themselves of the memory of former-slaves and in a more recent period he started to express itself on the black movements. The vision of ' ' white-libertador' ' propagated it is substituted for that the process of conquest of the emancipation standes out; being they them citizens of its proper history. The Museum confirms these affirmations in expositions, practical and commemorations. To follow the author it starts to deal with works whose subject is the Patrimony. First Marisa Veloso cites that warns for the danger based politics publishes them of Patrimony in the subject of the Intangible one and transforming the patrimonializados goods into merchandises. Alert that with the act of receiving of stamps of the agencies of the Government the cultural patrimony would pass to be valued by the capital and it would see it to this as object of I negotiate. It points out Brazil in this context as passvel of more still exarcebar the fights between social groups of what exactly to foment its congraamento. The author sees the patrimonializaco as significant of destruction. Already the article of Fillipo Grillini points reapropriacoes of the concept of culture and cultural diversity. It remembers that the indians, for the Brazilian Constitution are Cultural Patrimnio, tying to the social groups the notion of Patrimony and stimulates the defense...

Recent Comments