08/14/2012

NEXT POST
Decree Dispossession The procedure of the dispossession is become fullfilled in such a way for saw administrative, in which the Public Power declares its interest in the dispossession and starts to adopt the steps aiming at to the transference of the good, how much for it saw judicial, where an agreement with the proprietor is not homologated, concluding in an action to be moved by the State against the owner of the property. The Federal Constitution establishes the legitimation of the dispossession, classified as didactically usual, in its article 5: ' ' Art. 5: The law will establish the procedure for dispossession for necessity or public utility, or social interest, by means of joust and previous indemnity in money, excepted the cases foreseen in this Constituio.' '. In what it refers to the reasons To be able Public to transfer to itself the property to it of third itself of the one for the based one on 3 (three) estimated: The public utility if presents when the use of private properties is convenient to the administrative interests, even so they are not essential. The public convenience, such when the Administration confrots problems that only if can decide with the transference of private properties for the domain of the administrative person charged to solve them. The social interest of the State occurs when the transference of private properties for the public domain or of commission agents of the public power if imposes, as measured destined to decide problems of the collective created by the particular property of one or some individuals. 1 In the national legislation, the first time where the institute of the dispossession is cited, is about the Decree n 3,365 of 21/06-1941, that it regulates the laws general of the dispossession, that approaches the term of public utility, establishing the...
PREVIOUS POST
Study Sanctions The deputy by Madrid Antonio Gutirrez voted against the reform. Other three members of the socialist group in the chamber have not gone to the voting of this Friday. They will be the same problem in the Senate, where some socialist senators have announced their opposition to the reform. The direction of the PSOE in the Congress will study if it sanctions and in what quantity to the deputy by Madrid Antonio Gutirrez to vote against the constitutional reform and will also analyze the situations of the three parliamentarians who have not gone to vote. Sources of the direction of the socialist group have assured that any measurement has not been taken still on these facts, that they will be examined in the next days. Gutirrez is broken in two occasions this week the discipline of group when voting against the constitutional reform: the past Tuesday, in the taking in consideration, and this Friday, during its definitive approval in the House of Representatives. In addition, Manuel deputies of the Rocha, Jose Antonio have absented themselves of the plenary session Perez Tapias and Juan Antonio District of Penagos, the Socialist Left current, by its discord as much with the forms as with the bottom of the reform. The next week the reform of the Magna Carta in the Senate struggles, where the Socialists also could be with some " dscolo" , since so far two Basque senators (Iaki Zubero and Roberto Lerchundi) have already advanced who will be against. Source of the news: The PSOE will study sanctions to its deputies " dscolos" with the reform of the Constitution

Recent Comments