Study Sanctions The deputy by Madrid Antonio Gutirrez voted against the reform. Other three members of the socialist group in the chamber have not gone to the voting of this Friday. They will be the same problem in the Senate, where some socialist senators have announced their opposition to the reform. The direction of the PSOE in the Congress will study if it sanctions and in what quantity to the deputy by Madrid Antonio Gutirrez to vote against the constitutional reform and will also analyze the situations of the three parliamentarians who have not gone to vote. Sources of the direction of the socialist group have assured that any measurement has not been taken still on these facts, that they will be examined in the next days. Gutirrez is broken in two occasions this week the discipline of group when voting against the constitutional reform: the past Tuesday, in the taking in consideration, and this Friday, during its definitive approval in the House of Representatives. In addition, Manuel deputies of the Rocha, Jose Antonio have absented themselves of the plenary session Perez Tapias and Juan Antonio District of Penagos, the Socialist Left current, by its discord as much with the forms as with the bottom of the reform. The next week the reform of the Magna Carta in the Senate struggles, where the Socialists also could be with some " dscolo" , since so far two Basque senators (Iaki Zubero and Roberto Lerchundi) have already advanced who will be against. Source of the news: The PSOE will study sanctions to its deputies " dscolos" with the reform of the Constitution
Brazil Democracy The classroom which each one belongs is established then by the relation degree that if has with ' ' benefcios' ' cited previously, this generates a hierarquizao of the society, where the most favored they finish being superior to less the most favored, thus determining, also the paper that will be developed per item in the society. Then, the biggest classrooms finish for playing roles that subordinate the lesser classrooms. They are not abstained from these papers, the governmental positions. To speak in democracy in Brazil, is the same that to say in elections therefore the act to vote the biggest example of democracy practised in the country is considered. But it will be that it is really? Election is a process of choice of the controllers - they must represent the population, guaranteeing and fighting for its rights - of a country (it includes states and cities there), through the vote of its citizens. The Constitution defines them to be able politicians, including the vote, in its article 14, paragraphs I and II. In it is specified that the vote is obligator to all of 18 years to the 16 minor and physician and the greaters greaters of 18, greaters of 70 years and illiterates; is vetoed to the foreigners and during the military service. Analyzing this concept of election and this article, we can say that really all people have the right and obligation to choose its representatives, then, why exists this distorted concept so of democracy? Retaking the definition initial ' ' government of povo' '. The population votes in the people who if candidatam to some position - president, governor, senator - knowing that they will be who will go to represent them, this implies to fight for the rights - education, health, housing, feeding, security,...

Recent Comments