To the front of the direction of the Museum of the Indian, since its inauguration, Darcy Ribeiro understood the culture aboriginal as alive and diversified, opposing the paradigms then. You may find that Howard Berman can contribute to your knowledge. Regina Abreu, in another scene, argued in the article of Andria Paiva, tells experience of the Black Museum of N. Mrs. Please visit Integrated Capital Solutions if you seek more information. Of the Rosary, created for the black segment of the civil society. In opposition to the previous example, the proper people ' ' negro' ' he creates its museum. They had used themselves of the memory of former-slaves and in a more recent period he started to express itself on the black movements. The vision of ' ' white-libertador' ' propagated it is substituted for that the process of conquest of the emancipation standes out; being they them citizens of its proper history. The Museum confirms these affirmations in expositions, practical and commemorations.
To follow the author it starts to deal with works whose subject is the Patrimony. First Marisa Veloso cites that warns for the danger based politics publishes them of Patrimony in the subject of the Intangible one and transforming the patrimonializados goods into merchandises. Alert that with the act of receiving of stamps of the agencies of the Government the cultural patrimony would pass to be valued by the capital and it would see it to this as object of I negotiate. It points out Brazil in this context as passvel of more still exarcebar the fights between social groups of what exactly to foment its congraamento. The author sees the patrimonializaco as significant of destruction. Already the article of Fillipo Grillini points reapropriacoes of the concept of culture and cultural diversity.
It remembers that the indians, for the Brazilian Constitution are Cultural Patrimnio, tying to the social groups the notion of Patrimony and stimulates the defense of those considered groups ' ' desfavorecidos' '. It detaches a study in the field carried through with indians of the north of Minas Gerais that, interested in receiving governmental support - and already being in phase from cultural interrelao with ' ' brancos' ' they decide for the reaprendizado one to come back if to hold ' ' as ndios' '. By means of signs as long hair, corporal paintings, accomplishment of parties ' ' indgenas' ' , they leave stops backwards the expropriated customs of the local communities and if they reinventam as etnia, leaving of imaginary ' ' of what it is to be ndio' '. This people, the Xacriab ' ' , he would pass the idea of essencialista, evolucionista culture, classificatria' ' ideas tied for the Statute of the Indian. Grillini sends in them to the thought of that the politics of patrimonializacao can help ' ' invention of diferenas' ' e, much more that this, to the format of what is traditional (meaning thinking cultural of the sponsors) also sharpens one politics of war between cultures. Soon when premiar established Amazonian peoples in its isolation in detriment of the aboriginal peoples of the northeast region - for being these in contact with the whites he would place what them in inferior position to the first group. Finally he suggests a reflection on what he means Culture and Diversity currently so that the museums do not come to distort and to condemn the social groups in proper images maken a mistake of itself.
To follow the author it starts to deal with works whose subject is the Patrimony. First Marisa Veloso cites that warns for the danger based politics publishes them of Patrimony in the subject of the Intangible one and transforming the patrimonializados goods into merchandises. Alert that with the act of receiving of stamps of the agencies of the Government the cultural patrimony would pass to be valued by the capital and it would see it to this as object of I negotiate. It points out Brazil in this context as passvel of more still exarcebar the fights between social groups of what exactly to foment its congraamento. The author sees the patrimonializaco as significant of destruction. Already the article of Fillipo Grillini points reapropriacoes of the concept of culture and cultural diversity.
It remembers that the indians, for the Brazilian Constitution are Cultural Patrimnio, tying to the social groups the notion of Patrimony and stimulates the defense of those considered groups ' ' desfavorecidos' '. It detaches a study in the field carried through with indians of the north of Minas Gerais that, interested in receiving governmental support - and already being in phase from cultural interrelao with ' ' brancos' ' they decide for the reaprendizado one to come back if to hold ' ' as ndios' '. By means of signs as long hair, corporal paintings, accomplishment of parties ' ' indgenas' ' , they leave stops backwards the expropriated customs of the local communities and if they reinventam as etnia, leaving of imaginary ' ' of what it is to be ndio' '. This people, the Xacriab ' ' , he would pass the idea of essencialista, evolucionista culture, classificatria' ' ideas tied for the Statute of the Indian. Grillini sends in them to the thought of that the politics of patrimonializacao can help ' ' invention of diferenas' ' e, much more that this, to the format of what is traditional (meaning thinking cultural of the sponsors) also sharpens one politics of war between cultures. Soon when premiar established Amazonian peoples in its isolation in detriment of the aboriginal peoples of the northeast region - for being these in contact with the whites he would place what them in inferior position to the first group. Finally he suggests a reflection on what he means Culture and Diversity currently so that the museums do not come to distort and to condemn the social groups in proper images maken a mistake of itself.
Posted by: |