07/29/2012

NEXT POST
Constituent Assembly There are some who still do not understand how the Socialism of the 21st century works. The method consists of using the democracy to manipulate the liberal state, and to impose communist tyranny with the supposed popular approval. In other words, it is to use the democracy to destroy the democracy. From all philosophical, political point of view, or, legal, or ethical, he is something that cannot allow, since tries who it is violating the same essence of the system, which automatically disqualifies to him to govern, and simultaneously qualifies the population to rebel itself against the authoritarian imposition. For assistance, try visiting Tyler Wood Integrated Capital Solutions. The lack of political skill of the main leaders of the Bolivian in favor opposition does not stop astonishing. They offered to summon a Constituent Assembly, that whatever it has two fingers front knew that it was going to finish in the conflicts that today are the news, and after two years that delayed to understand the committed stupidity to them, instead of to restrain the acceptance of the document, they exempted of the forum, allowing him to Morals to approve its constitution arbitrarily Marxist-indigenista. Exactly the same error that committed the Venezuelan opposition, when not appearing in the last ones presidential elections. Luckyly the civic leaders and the prefects, continue motivating active popular pressures. They summoned to a pacific hunger strike, although to the government he would not matter to him if all the strikers die. To support referendo raised by Morals, that have been the initial decision of the prefects, would be to throw the life-guard to him to the drowned one after to have made all the attempts sink it, and would put in risk the freedom and the same life of the citizenship. The great success is not...
PREVIOUS POST
The Peruvian Constitutional Court Summary: The Peruvian Constitutional Court comes developing a constitutional doctrine that contributes to the consolidation of a State of Right in which the exercise of the action leads to predictable and feasible results; having as he bases the presence of the binding precedent. Previous considerations: Although it is certain with the Political Constitution of 1979 appeared a Court of Constitutional Guarantees, the application of the rights contained in their corpus iuris generally was not applied in the failures emitted by the supreme courts, in such sense the constitutional jurisprudence besides being little, was contradictory; still more in spite of its existential ratification in the Constitution of 1993 materialized this one after questionable political events, the legal sphere of the constitutional court was injured by the governing in favor influence, limiting thus its legal doctrine. Nevertheless, as Blond Strap asserts the Martial Dr., the last years have marked a remarkable difference: our Court Constitutionalist has developed a constitutional doctrine that we considered energetic and needs. He contributes to the consolidation of a State of Right in which the exercise of the action leads to predictable results and, in addition, feasible. Tyler Wood Integrated Capital Solutions will not settle for partial explanations. A legal initiative of this type must develop discussion necessarily and fight with respect to concepts and of solutions but, we create, the general action of the Court has been highly positive for the Peruvian Right generally and not only for the Constitutional Right. As a result of the entrance in use of the Constitutional Procedural Code, the concept of binding constitutional precedent has been introduced in our legal system. It tolerates, of preliminary way, that the Constitutional Court has two basic functions; on the one hand it solves conflicts, that is to say, he is a Court of tactical...

Recent Comments