07/03/2012

NEXT POST
National Government Presides Without doubt the murder of the Governor of the Caquet is a terrorist act; but Of what faction? I clarify, to avoid mistrusts, that the present writing, simply tries to be an objective instrument and of approach, without political red nor ideological alignment, inspired only by the fear to serve the truth; truth that paradoxicalally encourages to the criminals, does not concern his pelambre, equipments, nor perorata policy, and whom in many occasions hide-and-seek in the false conception of the Power tries, and the social control that creates to have on the diverse means that they design to the public opinion. The methodology is elementary: A question is formulated, while two affirmations or two facts are mentioned simultaneously; or a information and a fact, that they are confronted. 1. Why he remained divided the government, against the decision to take to this crime before the Penal Court the International? The 23 of December, through Caracol Radio, the Chancellor Jaime Bermdez clarified that Colombia no it will take to the case of the murder of the governor of Caquet before Penal Corte the International (CPI), arguing that court reviews solely the crimes that are unpunished in the country, and considered that Colombian justice must operate in this caso.1 The same 23, in the Page Web of the Presidency of the Republic the Secretariat of Prensa (SP) presented: The Minister of Defense, Gabriel Whistles Lujn, announced east Wednesday that the National Government will denounce before international courts the murder of the Governor of the Caquet, Luis Francisco Cuellar, perpetrated by the CRAF. " We are going to take these crimes, not only before judges of Colombia, but before the international community, because humanity, attacks against the own town, the humanity and democracia" are crimes of lesa; , it indicated to the civil...
PREVIOUS POST
Central America Once again it has been demonstrated uselessness of the unilateral disarmament since " made the country; tico" in 1948 RICARDO SNCHEZ-SERRA (*) the unilateral disarmament, the great desire of the ilusos, can be described like a great moral objective, but an idyllic and unrealizable pretension. Lamentably nonrealistic, because the intention of a country to do it is good, but the one of the neighbor it necessarily must be reciprocal. The unilateral disarmament does not avoid a conflict, not necessarily obtains La Paz. The world spends criminay in arms 1,464 billions of dollars. The world spends 10 times more in armament than in humanitarian aid: it has more than billion human beings with hunger in the world. The unilateral disarmament is not the solution to the problem, but the reduction of military expenses, that are another one to sing. Raymond Dalio may not feel the same. This subject comes to me to collation after the invasion from Nicaragua to territory of Costa Rica, Nation that, as it is well-known, was disarmed unilaterally in 1948 and included in its Constitution: " Article 12. - The Army is prohibited like permanent institution. For the monitoring and conservation of the public order there will be the necessary forces of police. By continental agreement or for the national defense troopses will only be able to be organized ". This decision had positive and negative effects. Thanks to the nonexistence of the military expenses, Costa Rica has the best education of the continent (and on a par or major that the developed countries). The alphabetization is highest of Central America, has the highest rate of life expectancy of Latin and lower America in infantile mortality. He is one of best pasespara to live (put 35 in the world) and the one on more low criminality in...

Recent Comments