06/28/2012

NEXT POST
Mentality Education This implies: that educating and the potentiality of the child, which, private of the above-mentioned teaching, would not never arrive to elaborate types of acceptable behaviors; that certain behaviors, socially approved, are the objective of the education, as well as its last end, without which if it backslides in the abnormality; that the impulse to operate in that definitive way must be part of the mentality of educating until, in certain point, it does not need more educated being and can follow the alone way, becoming in turn and an educator. Well-behaved it would be, therefore, an individual that according to acts norms established for the effective custom, that is and irreversible conditional in this direction, and that therefore it does not need later monitoring or other teachings. If everything that is truth, is for clarifying which the difference enters a child well-behaved a well amestrado dog. which the difference between education and a banal and coarse conditioning. In the truth, most elementary common-sense induces to the categorical refusal of all estimated what normally education is called. To think that the child must be educated and the adult not, is absolutely ridicule. If it admits, and I do not see as to deny it of reasonable form, that the education is an operation dialectic in which the person is the citizen, and it object, that all constitutes the first push for the evolutivo movement, is not understood why reason the adult does not continue participating of this operation. As if the arrival of the call maturity it coincided with a state of absolute and insupervel perfection. Reason is not understood why the antisocial, necessarily wild child return-if- and criminalide if the adult not to provide to restrain the evil and to teach to it the good to it, by means...
PREVIOUS POST
Supreme Federal Court The young republic had ahead of itself the difficult task to transform the rude natures of blacks, mulatos and indians (and immigrants) in one alone civil society, which if would over all base on the production of passveis citizens to be submitted to the normatividade of the laws and on the morality of the religion (Christian). It was treated then to absorb and to reinterpretar the available antropolgico knowledge to discern the more clearly possible those that could be objects of the legal normatividade: wizards, healers, quacks, explorers of the public credulidade or simple victims. (...) such classificatrio exercise widely was undertaken by the Brazilian jurisprudence, that, assisted for the police authorities, investigated the public and private spaces so that the habits of the population were known, classified and disciplined or tipificados criminalmente.' ' ix Encontramos in Brazil the prerogative of laity of the limited State the separation of the civil acts, of the religious acts (baptism, marriage, burial, education, health etc.), however, the fight between laicizao and secularizao of the State is permanent as we will be able to observe in the interventions of the Church Catholic through the institutionalization of religious education, in the indissolubilidade of the marriage and more recently in the fight against the abortion and the civil union between homosexuals. The contradiction of the laity of the Brazilian State can be noticed soon in the preamble of the Federal Constitution and in the state constitutions when expressing the invocation of protection of God and that it is justified and same Supreme Federal Court was judged by the STF, as something sedimented in the culture, substance of long date pacified in the jurisprudence and the constitutional doctrine Brazilian. We will specifically find the fight against the laity of the Brazilian State in the controversy of education...

Recent Comments