Modern Poetry

It just so happens that I do quite a long time poetic technical support site. In this situtsii perforce begin to delve into the essence of the phenomenon called modern poetry. Of course, I judging from their point of view, with the reader. Nevertheless, for some reason, wanted to share my observations. It will, of course, on a network of poetry, but it is suspected that the whole of modern poetry (or almost all) have already moved the network. It turns out that in the poetry itself is not so simple. Will you come here on the Stanza, and like myself write poems citizens for his own pleasure, and recklessly graphomaniac praising each other, maintain morale.

That's what she and Stanza - portal, a national server. It's not for poetry websites, editorial policies here, but where politics, there is interesting. Here and it turns out that in modern poetry, no matter how vague because of the huge number of writers who did not seem this phenomenon, there are different trends. Some, for example, are ardent supporters of the preservation of the classical system of prosody, with all iambs, choir and amphibrachs, but just as active opponents of the so-called hackneyed rhymes (meaning the exact rhyme). This is perhaps the largest army of servants of the Muses. The works of the proponents of this system of versification, generally distinguished by conspicuous lyubitelschina, lack of interesting content and a low of speech. I plagued by vague doubts, in the words of a famous character that the whole system and was invented only to justify his own poetic failure.